anagavel
02-24 06:32 AM
Hello Everyone,
I have filed my H1B in 2008 & the status is still pending. So can I apply for another H1B in 2009?
Please Help me in this regard by giving your valuable inputs!
I have filed my H1B in 2008 & the status is still pending. So can I apply for another H1B in 2009?
Please Help me in this regard by giving your valuable inputs!
wallpaper Sarah Jessica Parker and
v2010
07-09 02:24 PM
Hello,
I have few questions and seeking your advise on it. Currently I have a H1B and EAD with EB3 category GC application.
1. I am working on H1B for "X" company and they have filed extension for it. Now, I got an offer from "Y" company and they are willing to transfer my H1B.
Is there any problem for H1B transfer to the Y company while it is filed for extension from my current employer?
2. The new company "Y" is also going to file my new GC labor and I-140 as job has little different and senior role but similar to what I had in my previous H1B and GC labor in EB2 category.
Now, can my current employer "X" company remove I-140 or create any kind of problem for my immigration status, specially with GC?
Any information, you can provide will be really helpful.
I have few questions and seeking your advise on it. Currently I have a H1B and EAD with EB3 category GC application.
1. I am working on H1B for "X" company and they have filed extension for it. Now, I got an offer from "Y" company and they are willing to transfer my H1B.
Is there any problem for H1B transfer to the Y company while it is filed for extension from my current employer?
2. The new company "Y" is also going to file my new GC labor and I-140 as job has little different and senior role but similar to what I had in my previous H1B and GC labor in EB2 category.
Now, can my current employer "X" company remove I-140 or create any kind of problem for my immigration status, specially with GC?
Any information, you can provide will be really helpful.
Macaca
12-07 10:30 AM
Holding the Hungry Hostage (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/07/opinion/07fri2.html) NY Editorial, December 7, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
It is a travesty that the fates of some 35 million Americans who need food aid are tied to the farm bill, which comes up every five years. The House passed an inadequate version last summer, and the Senate has failed to advance its own. It is time to ask why feeding the hungry must include a trough for multibillion-dollar agribusiness.
As it has pressed to keep its subsidies, about $26 billion in the current bill, agribusiness has contributed $415 million to federal political campaigns since 1990, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The hungry don’t have much of a lobby. But those who cannot consistently put food on the table need the help promised in the bill, including more than $4 billion in improvements in the food stamp program and for emergency assistance. If the aid remains in the farm bill, and if it remains in a logjam, aid would continue at current, inadequate levels.
Food stamps regularly help 26 million people get something to eat. But the previous farm bill did not peg benefits to inflation, so as food prices have skyrocketed, families who were just barely getting by are now in a much worse place. Some 800,000 food stamp recipients — disproportionately elderly or disabled — are being told to make due on a minimum benefit of $10 per month. That amount has remained unchanged in 30 years.
As The Times recently reported, food banks and soup kitchens across the nation are being depleted by demand so overwhelming that the needy are being turned away, or given help so minimal, it is hardly worth the energy expended to get it.
Washington needs to do better. The Senate could start by rallying around the sensible legislation sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg, Democrat of New Jersey, and Richard Lugar, Republican of Indiana. It would replace crop supports with an insurance program to cover actual losses, and put the savings, potentially billions of dollars, to better use, including for food aid.
Or the Congress could make a bold statement and begin to restructure funding. It could get money to food banks faster if it came out of any bill but the farm bill.
The Bush administration has correctly opposed the excesses of the farm subsidies program, but it could do more. It could finance additional and immediate food assistance by dipping deeper into money culled from customs receipts to support farm and nutrition programs.
Since their beginnings, hunger relief and nutrition programs have been inextricably tied to helping farmers. That may have made sense once. But as recent maneuvers on the farm bill have shown, it no longer works.
Republicans — by far the biggest beneficiaries of agribusiness largess — are using the advantage of being a bare minority to try to attach a flurry of amendments on immigration, taxes and any other issue but the desperate one at hand. Farm state senators look the other way so a bill, warts and all, can get done.
They need to put America’s hungry first.
Senators Reach Tentative Farm Deal (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602408.html) By MARY CLARE JALONICK | Associated Press, December 6, 2007
Senate ends farm bill impasse, may pass in days (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/06/AR2007120602662.html) By Charles Abbott | Reuters, December 6, 2007
2011 Sarah Jessica Parker and
jambapamba
08-08 06:51 PM
I have filed for AOS for myself and my wife. She is visiting india next month and needs to return on H4.
Since I have valid h1....can she apply for h4 or is that risky?
Hard to tell not knowing these things:
1. Were you ever out of status from the last time you entered?
2. Do you have paychecks for all the months on H1?
3. Which visa center are you visiting ?
4. Was your wife ever out of status from the last time she entered US?
It's all in the history. If it's clean, its not a problem. If you are not sure, then wait for AP as it would be a safe backup.
Since I have valid h1....can she apply for h4 or is that risky?
Hard to tell not knowing these things:
1. Were you ever out of status from the last time you entered?
2. Do you have paychecks for all the months on H1?
3. Which visa center are you visiting ?
4. Was your wife ever out of status from the last time she entered US?
It's all in the history. If it's clean, its not a problem. If you are not sure, then wait for AP as it would be a safe backup.
more...
dhirajgrover
01-20 10:53 PM
I am helping!!
Here's how:
http://kcdesi.com/kcdesi/index.php?option=com_classifieds&Itemid=56&searchadv=&catid=26
Let me know if anyone has any issue accessing this link.
Thanks
Here's how:
http://kcdesi.com/kcdesi/index.php?option=com_classifieds&Itemid=56&searchadv=&catid=26
Let me know if anyone has any issue accessing this link.
Thanks
Blog Feeds
07-30 03:50 PM
The Boston Globe reports on another case of a potential DREAM Act recipient facing deportation. Alan, the individual who is the subject of the story, is the son of Mexican migrant laborers, came to the US as an infant and his academic success has been an inspiration to children in his neighborhood. Like many others, he did not learn he was illegally present in the US until he was much older - in this case, high school. The Globe notes that Alan is going to leave the US: Now Alan sees Mexico as his only option. His mother is against...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/harvard-grad-faces-deportation.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/harvard-grad-faces-deportation.html)
more...
yuvarajc
09-13 08:52 PM
Iam sure lot of people have asked this question.
Iam in my 6th yr of H1b.
I have my I140 approved and I received my 3 yrs extension.
Question is can i shift jobs now? What are my options?
Once I move to the new job and file for GC, can I claim the old PD date ?
Thanks
Iam in my 6th yr of H1b.
I have my I140 approved and I received my 3 yrs extension.
Question is can i shift jobs now? What are my options?
Once I move to the new job and file for GC, can I claim the old PD date ?
Thanks
2010 Sarah Jessica Parker, Matthew
ramprasad_r
02-03 12:34 PM
Hello All,
I had attended H1 interview in last week of Nov 2007. I had got 221g BLUE form to submit additional documents from Petitioner.
I submitted all documents through VFS drop box in last week of Jan 2008. Does anyone has any idea within how many weeks time we will get some response from Chennai consulate?
I was not asked to submit passport and hence I havent submitted passport.
I appreciate any inputs from any one.
Regards,
Ram
I had attended H1 interview in last week of Nov 2007. I had got 221g BLUE form to submit additional documents from Petitioner.
I submitted all documents through VFS drop box in last week of Jan 2008. Does anyone has any idea within how many weeks time we will get some response from Chennai consulate?
I was not asked to submit passport and hence I havent submitted passport.
I appreciate any inputs from any one.
Regards,
Ram
more...
babugc40
03-19 07:34 PM
I was working with company A and got approved I140(1 year back) after that I moved to company B using approved I140 and got 3 yrs H1B extension.After that during July,07 period I requested company A to apply EAD and i485(Company A mentioned as future employment).Now I am still with company B.
But now Company A asking me to come back.Since I have everything approved (i140) except i485(pending) do I need to go back to company A?
If I do not go to company A,can he cancel approved I140 ?
Need help/suggestion .
Thanks
But now Company A asking me to come back.Since I have everything approved (i140) except i485(pending) do I need to go back to company A?
If I do not go to company A,can he cancel approved I140 ?
Need help/suggestion .
Thanks
hair Matthew Broderick and Sarah
iptel
02-21 05:53 PM
I am from California. One of the requirement as you all know is Notice of Job posting with SWA. We have a new person in our HR who deals with immigration the earlier one left .
Problem Description: According to our new HR posting jobs on http://www.caljobs.ca.gov/
is equivalent to Notice of Job posting. Can anyone from California confirm if that is true. If there is additional method can you provide the details or any link.
Your help will be highly appreciated.
Problem Description: According to our new HR posting jobs on http://www.caljobs.ca.gov/
is equivalent to Notice of Job posting. Can anyone from California confirm if that is true. If there is additional method can you provide the details or any link.
Your help will be highly appreciated.
more...
willIWill
04-06 02:50 PM
I came across this recently. Not sure if it was posted here earlier, it is important enough to be aware of, as it is directly from the Horse's mouth.
USCIS - Practical Immigration Consequences for Foreign Workers in a Slowing Economy (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=67cd9369e6367210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=2dd6dbbb86c3e110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
USCIS - Practical Immigration Consequences for Foreign Workers in a Slowing Economy (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=67cd9369e6367210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=2dd6dbbb86c3e110VgnVCM1000004718190a RCRD)
hot More Reports of Sarah Jessica
chanduv23
10-05 10:34 AM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
more...
house Sarah Jessica Parker and
cantbelieve
07-06 02:07 PM
Hi,
Please help me out on this.
My employer provided me with substituion LC with PD: Oct 2002, EB, and filed an I140 using it last year. The RD on it is Nov 2005. The 140 had 2 RFEs both asking for submission of original LC. As per the attorney the original LC was submitted with the application, and the attorney requested the CIS to get the copy of LC from DOL, as per the regulation as she says. Now this week CIS as send a denial on this case.
My questions are:
1. The attorney says, she can no longer get the duplicate of the LC from the DOL, as it's an old substitution case. Is there any other way, or solution on this?
2. The origianal LC was filed along with the I140 petition. Is that usual? Should all the originals must have been submitted only on request?
3. Is there any way to make this case alive again? What are the chances of approval if we reopen the case.
Thanks,
CB
Please help me out on this.
My employer provided me with substituion LC with PD: Oct 2002, EB, and filed an I140 using it last year. The RD on it is Nov 2005. The 140 had 2 RFEs both asking for submission of original LC. As per the attorney the original LC was submitted with the application, and the attorney requested the CIS to get the copy of LC from DOL, as per the regulation as she says. Now this week CIS as send a denial on this case.
My questions are:
1. The attorney says, she can no longer get the duplicate of the LC from the DOL, as it's an old substitution case. Is there any other way, or solution on this?
2. The origianal LC was filed along with the I140 petition. Is that usual? Should all the originals must have been submitted only on request?
3. Is there any way to make this case alive again? What are the chances of approval if we reopen the case.
Thanks,
CB
tattoo Sarah Jessica Parker And
masterdude
03-11 09:47 PM
Sorry, I got an error so i keep on posting till i was tired.
more...
pictures Sarah Jessica Parker and
ajaysri
09-13 05:21 PM
can any one answer the question please.
dresses sarah-jessica-parker-matthew-
Blog Feeds
11-27 02:00 AM
There used to be a Remington Razor commercial with the late Victor Kiam where the entrepreneur said "I liked the razor so much, I bought the company." That kind of reminds me of the story of my friend and colleague of several years Karen Weinstock, the manager of our firm's Atlanta office. Karen moved to the US from Israel and I was her immigration lawyer. Prior to coming to the US, Karen was an intellectual property lawyer in Tel Aviv at one of Israel's largest law firms. Karen originally planned on focusing her practice on corporate and intellectual property law,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/immigrant-of-the-day-karen-weinstock-immigration-lawyer-extraordinaire.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/11/immigrant-of-the-day-karen-weinstock-immigration-lawyer-extraordinaire.html)
more...
makeup Broderick and Parker have been
wildcherry47
07-05 04:35 AM
Hi,
Received your message. Thanks for your reply.
Received your message. Thanks for your reply.
girlfriend Sarah Jessica Parker and her
jasonmc86
07-26 09:29 PM
Hi There,
String directory = "E:\\pic\\";
// assuming your textbox name is textbox1
String pictureToDisplay = textbox1.Text;
System.Drawing.Image myImage = System.Drawing.Image.FromFile(directory + pictureToDisplay + ".jpg");
//You could use a picturebox and set the image = myImage;
pictureBox1.Image = myImage;
Hope this helps
Cheers
Jason
String directory = "E:\\pic\\";
// assuming your textbox name is textbox1
String pictureToDisplay = textbox1.Text;
System.Drawing.Image myImage = System.Drawing.Image.FromFile(directory + pictureToDisplay + ".jpg");
//You could use a picturebox and set the image = myImage;
pictureBox1.Image = myImage;
Hope this helps
Cheers
Jason
hairstyles Sarah Jessica Parker and
H2G
07-14 01:39 PM
Hi,
I was working with a company in H1-b visa, and after 3 years renewed our H1 and H4 with the same company,
and both got extended upto 30th September 2011 . Later, i have transfered our H1 and H4 to a new company
in January 2009, and H1 extended from 10th January 2009 to 4th January 2012. After 3 months H4 approved
from 1st October 2011 to 4th January 2012.In short, H1 approved from the applied date of the last H1 to
4th January 2012, but H4 approved from the expiration date + 1 day of the previous H4 to 4th January 2012.
Since, i'm with a new employer what is the status of the H4 now. Looking for your valuable suggestions.
Thanks-H2G
I was working with a company in H1-b visa, and after 3 years renewed our H1 and H4 with the same company,
and both got extended upto 30th September 2011 . Later, i have transfered our H1 and H4 to a new company
in January 2009, and H1 extended from 10th January 2009 to 4th January 2012. After 3 months H4 approved
from 1st October 2011 to 4th January 2012.In short, H1 approved from the applied date of the last H1 to
4th January 2012, but H4 approved from the expiration date + 1 day of the previous H4 to 4th January 2012.
Since, i'm with a new employer what is the status of the H4 now. Looking for your valuable suggestions.
Thanks-H2G
needhelp!
02-04 07:10 PM
We have a law firm that helps us with IV: thawerlaw.com
The immigration attorney is Kimberly Kinser. She did a live Q&A session for our members. I don't have case experience from them, but I know they are good people. :)
The immigration attorney is Kimberly Kinser. She did a live Q&A session for our members. I don't have case experience from them, but I know they are good people. :)
va_dude
07-09 03:27 PM
There is no change really for Advance Parole applicants.
The form 131 is used for more than just AP applicants, its used for refugees and re-entry permits too.
Read this from page 2 of that memo.
Q. Do the revised Form I-131 instructions require advance parole applicants to complete biometrics?
A. Applicants for advance parole are not required to submit biometrics at this time. An applicant for advance parole must continue to submit two identical color photographs of the applicant taken within 30 days of the filing of the Form I-131 application.
The form 131 is used for more than just AP applicants, its used for refugees and re-entry permits too.
Read this from page 2 of that memo.
Q. Do the revised Form I-131 instructions require advance parole applicants to complete biometrics?
A. Applicants for advance parole are not required to submit biometrics at this time. An applicant for advance parole must continue to submit two identical color photographs of the applicant taken within 30 days of the filing of the Form I-131 application.
No comments:
Post a Comment