north korean women beautiful

images North Korea

North korean guide in

Templarian

03-18 05:02 PM

Close it's results from a survey I did with like 15 people. Lets say they were in a certain state of mind.

---

wallpaper North korean guide in

I love eautiful Asian women?

Blog Feeds

05-30 08:30 AM

Acting on a request for House Immigration Subcommittee Ranking Democrat Zoe Lofgren, DHS' Office of Inspector General will launch an investigation of the Secure Communities program. [Note: Apologies to readers for inadvertantly initially noting the 287(g) program was being investigated. Secure Communities is similar to 287(g) in terms of DHS entering in to agreements with state and local law enforcement. Secure Communities is largely about information sharing between the agencies while 287(g) allows local law enforcement to carry out arrests and detention of immigrants. The programs are often discussed jointly and both have come under criticism, but as a few...

More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/dhs-inspector-to-investigate-287g-program.html)

---

Leaked North Korean files

madooripraveen

03-20 03:50 PM

On mar 12th I got a query on I-485.
It says.

The Documentation submitted with your application and/or a review of service records indicate that you no longer reside in the same state or geographical location as the underlying form i-140 immigration petitioner and /or job location specified by your intended permanent employer.

There fore submit a currently dated letter from your original form I-140 employer which which address this discrepancy.

I filed my labor and I-140 I was in california, i moved to different state since I filed my 485, till now I am with the same employer.

Any gurus who can suggest me on the query would be greatly appreciated.

thanks

---

2011 I love eautiful Asian women?

Now you, too, can woo women

Blog Feeds

11-08 03:30 PM

USCIS has updated the H-1B cap count (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=138b6138f898d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=91919c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD). As of October 30, 2009, CIS has received approximately 53,800 cases against the regular (non-Master's) H-1B cap. For more information, see the previous blog posts here (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/search/label/H-1B).

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1233041809634429002?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com


More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/11/h-1b-cap-count-updated.html)

---

more...

people in North Korea ran

anonymous

04-07 04:33 PM

Hello Friends,
The situation is my GC application is ongoing, while I am presently working on EAD(based on husband's application). If I change my job, within the same company, and move from one job family to another(within IT itself), what is the impact to,
a) GC process
b) EAD

I would appreciate any advice.

---

more.

mannishk

09-28 10:08 PM

Hello Attorney`s

I am in a weird situation here, I was Laid off on July 21st with pay in lieu until 4th August. I had applied for Change of Status to F2 (my wife is on F1) on 17th August. On 31st August I got a job offer and applied for H1B transfer to USCIS on 8th September (using 15th august paystub as the latest).

At the same time i filed to USCIS to revoke my F2 application.

Today I got a notice from USCIS that my application for change of status to F2 is approved as of 09/21/2009.

Now, I dont know what to do, does it mean I am now on F2? Is my H1B transfer application still valid or I need to apply again this time on premium processing.

What should be my next course of action. Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated.

Thanks so much..!!

Have a great day..!

---

more...

North Korea says former U.S.

saibaba

12-18 02:48 PM

I131, APPLICATION FOR USCIS TRAVEL DOCUMENT
Current Status: We mailed you a notice requesting additional evidence.


hi friends...

I got RFE on my wife's 131...

Last time we took our photos at Ritz Camera...they accepted mine but held her case due to these photo issue...

My attorney received this RFE and he scanned it for me..

Do we have to submit the entire app now?

advise me

Thanks

---

2010 Leaked North Korean files

North Korea

pradeepd

10-18 02:02 PM

Hi,

I'm currently on my amlost 6th year of my H1B. I have my i-140 (Still valid) approved from my previous employer under EB3. I'm applying for a new PERM with my current employer and I would want to apply in EB2. I hold 3ys bachelor's degree with 12 yrs of experience. My attorney says that chances are either my PERM or I-140 will be denied based on my education qualification.

I'm looking for your advice on the following.

1) I heard that I can apply for 3yr extn based on my previous I-140. Considering that is it worth the fight on EB2. I'm looking to port my PD (Nov 2008) to this I140 if approved.
2) My company sponsers two PERM to be applied, so it is worth to try for EB2 and later if denied on EB3. Will this affect my H1B extensions? say if it's get rejected on EB2, am I not eligible to apply for H1B extension with my current employer, since my labor/i-140 is denied.

Please help. I'm just not able to get this over my head :(

Thanks,
Pradeep

---

more...

Mature Korean Women

kumar1

08-19 04:13 PM

Just check X Ray report.

---

hair Now you, too, can woo women

A women#39;s group has issued a

vimouze

07-24 12:05 AM

Hello everyone,

I'm new to this forum, but this is a great source of information.

Here is my situation. My wife is a US citizen and we've been married for 2 year and 3 months, and I have the conditional green card for almost 2 years. I can't say this has been the best time of my life. She has kids of her own, and we ran into so much problem. And we both wish get a divorce. My conditional green card is expiring, and I know a divorce would affect my status. But seems like I can't take this anymore. During this time, I've been with another us citizen. She understand my situation, and has always supported me. I do want to marry her after my divorce. So, I'm seeking for some advice from everybody on what I should do in this situation. Thank you

---

more...

Kim#39;s Angels staan paraat

aspireus

05-19 03:57 PM

My I 140 approved under Eb3 if i want to change my job and my employer is willing to do in EB2 can I use my old PD from I140 EB3 ?

---

hot people in North Korea ran

Girl in Pyongyang- North Korea

b3mus3d

11-10 07:00 AM

Wow, that's really cool. Nice and simple, I like it.

---

more...

house A woman walks by a North

20100622-north-korea-football-

ab53579

06-18 07:50 PM

Guys,
I am filing 1-140 and 1-485 together by myself based upn EB-2 ( national interest waiver ) category.
Would any one of you please tell me what I should check Part 2 where it ask " I am applying fr adjustment f permanent status based upon"-- If I choose 2(a), then it ask for copy of approval notice.

Any body has any comments.
Thanks,
Jan

---

tattoo more.

images image 8-322-25 Portrait

gcpool

11-15 03:03 PM

Say if one has two I-140 and wish to port the priority from the older one to the later one. And if the USCIS does not agree with your filing(maybe they will say the filing is not possible or not portable). What will they do? Will they deny the I-485 or will they just reject the application. If so will it cause an issue when the later priority date is reached and during the application of the following I-485.

---

more...

pictures North Korea says former U.S.

Dating Russian Women

bharmohan

05-23 07:54 AM

Hello Gurus,
I have filed my PERM through my employer and they mis-spelled my name wrongly. How can I correct this. Still my labor is in pending condition. My employer says we will change it once got approved. But is there a way to correct it before it gets approved?. Please advice me.

---

dresses Girl in Pyongyang- North Korea

portrayal of women.

bonjovi

10-10 12:31 PM

I have this thought. We start a letter campaign sending letters to all the house members: 1) To get them aware of Legal immigration and 2) To put our case fwd.

I feel it will be very effective as the flower campaign. Atleast most of us can participate in it, less expensive, less time consuming. And we can see why we wouldn't they respond to the bulk of mail they are getting every day.

I know we did letters through email etc. But i think sending through post will be different and they will be obligated to respond.

I do not know whether this is a good idea. so please dont rush at me.:)


Ravi

---

more...

makeup Mature Korean Women

A woman walks by a North

ita

07-24 05:30 PM

My attorney sent the EAD application to Nebraska SC.
Earlier my 485/EAD/AP were all sent to Texas Center.
Does anyone know if this is fine .. sending the renewal papers to Nebraska?
I'm also trying to find out from my attorney why they were sent to NSC and not TSC

Thank you.

---

girlfriend images image 8-322-25 Portrait

Beautiful Women of Brazil

sertasheep

03-16 11:24 AM

We need at least 10 more questions to be able to conduct the next conference call with Ms. Susan Henner. Please send us your questions to the email address listed in this thread: Click here (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3532)

Please follow the procedure listed in the thread above so that your questions are crisp and lucid

Visit the Immigration Voice Blog (Click) (http://immigrationvoice.blogspot.com) to listen to recordings of previous conference calls.

---

hairstyles Kim#39;s Angels staan paraat

Captive in North Korea

manish217

09-17 12:21 PM

I got a labor substitution by Company A and filed I-140 and 485 through Company A in 2007. After I got EAD and my I-140 was approved and past 6 months I moved to company B in mid of 2008 and company B filed for AC-21, my role at company B is over and I have an offer for a lucrative job with Company C but the role is slightly different from the one listed in my labor petition. Company C is good but sceptical in filing AC-21 with the previous set of responsibilities. I have my EAD valid till early 2011. In case I move to Company C and company B revokes my application what is the situation that I can face? Will my EAD still be valid or will I loose status immediately? Can I continue working on my EAD with company C without filing AC-21?

Please advice ... I have my career at stake and need your help on this issue

---

jamesingham

08-16 03:14 PM

Does anyone have any information about the number of applications that were recieved by USCIS till now ?

I didnt apply for 485 Bcoz, I am not married. So lil curious when my next chance will come

---

Macaca

05-19 07:04 AM

House GOP Uses Procedural Tactic To Frustrate Democratic Majority Motion to Recommit Employed to Delay or Alter Legislation (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/18/AR2007051801697.html?hpid=topnews) By Lyndsey Layton (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/lyndsey+layton/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Saturday, May 19, 2007

House Republicans, fighting to remain relevant in a chamber ruled by Democrats, have increasingly seized on a parliamentary technique to alter or delay nearly a dozen pieces of legislation pushed by the majority this year.

And an election-year promise by Democrats to pay for any new programs they created has made it easier for Republicans to trip them up.

Tensions over the maneuvers reached a boil this week. Republicans used procedural tactics to stall floor debate for four hours Wednesday, and they are threatening to tie up future legislative action.

The stalling tactics prompted Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) to leave the floor and meet privately in his office with Republican Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and his whip, Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). The men emerged with an uneasy detente that they said would last at least until Congress breaks for the Memorial Day recess, but the matter is far from settled.

Since January, GOP leaders have relied on a maneuver known as the "motion to recommit" to stymie Democrats and score political points for Republicans still adjusting to life in the minority.

The motion to recommit allows the minority a chance to amend a bill on the floor or send it back to committee, effectively killing it. In a legislative body in which the party in power controls nearly everything, it is one of the few tools the minority has to effect change.

In the 12 years of Republican control that ended in January, Democrats passed 11 motions to recommit. Republicans have racked up the same number in just five months of this Congress.

Democrats say any comparison is unfair because when Republicans controlled Congress, they directed their members to vote against all Democratic motions to recommit.

Now in the majority and mindful of staying there, Democrats have given no such instruction to their members, allowing them to break with the party if they choose. Many freshmen Democrats from GOP-leaning districts find themselves voting with Republicans as a matter of survival -- a reality Republicans have seized upon.

"Sometimes we offer motions to recommit to improve legislation -- sometimes it's to force Democrats in marginal districts to make tough choices," Boehner said. "Every time the Republicans win, it boosts morale. We're able to show unity, which is good for the overall team. Members feel good about winning on the House floor. And when you're in the minority, it doesn't happen that often."

Democrats dismiss the Republican maneuvers as largely symbolic and so arcane as to be irrelevant to the public.

"From a public policy standpoint, it's not very significant," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), regarded as an expert in parliamentary combat. "It's almost a Capture the Flag game. The number of people in America who say, 'Oh my gosh, the Republicans won another motion to recommit' is very small."

But Republicans argue they have been able to make significant changes. They point to Thursday, when they successfully used a motion to recommit to restore millions of dollars for missile defense to a defense bill. It remains to be seen if that money will survive a conference committee.

"It's kind of a 'Rashomon' world," said Thomas Mann, a congressional scholar at the Brookings Institution, referring to the movie in which participants in an event all recount it differently. "The two parties see it in very different terms."

The Democrats' own rules have made it easier for Republicans to offer motions to recommit. In January, the party promised to observe "pay-go" -- finding a way to pay for any new spending rather than adding to the federal deficit. The unintended consequence is that tax proposals open legislation to modifications by the minority that would not otherwise be allowed.

Such was the case in March, when Democrats tried to pass a bill to give the District of Columbia a vote in the House. The bill included an additional seat for Utah and a minuscule tax increase to pay for two more House seats -- it called for expanding a provision of federal tax withholding law by .003 percent.

Republicans seized on the opening and moved to recommit the bill to committee, attaching new language that would have thrown out the District's strict anti-gun laws.

Worried that conservative, pro-gun Democrats would feel compelled to vote with GOP and kill the bill, Democratic leaders yanked it from the floor. They regrouped and split the bill into two tightly written measures, both of which passed and are pending in the Senate.

But the problem for Democrats was apparent. "We need to address that, or we're going to be, on every bill . . . [facing] an amendment totally unrelated to the substance of the bill," Hoyer said at the time.

This week, Democratic staffers privately discussed a rule change to limit the Republicans' ability to make motions to recommit. GOP leaders were incensed and threatened to use all available procedural techniques to block every bill except war spending legislation. But Democrats are hampered by their promise to run the chamber in a more open fashion than Republicans did when in the majority.

Hoyer agreed to hold off on further rule changes until Memorial Day and consult Boehner and Blunt on possible changes.

"The bottom line is, the war goes on," Mann said. "The majority uses the rules to structure debates and limit amendments on matters where Republicans have a chance to either break up the Democrats' winning coalition or embarrass them."

---