monu19_75
11-06 06:03 PM
I believe you should just send the H1B approval.
wallpaper Poems – Friendship
Macaca
02-18 06:55 PM
Some paras from In Majority, Democrats Run Hill Much as GOP Did (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701352.html).
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
ronhira
04-27 09:13 AM
do not try to contact aliens..... Stephen Hawking says Alien Contact Could Be Risky
Stephen Hawking: Alien Contact Could Be Risky - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Space/stephen-hawking-alien-contact-risky/story?id=10478157)
no problem, arizona state congress have a response plan to tackle all aliens. arizona just passed a bill to handle aliens - arrest everyone who don't look like us.... lets now look for the space ships....
Stephen Hawking: Alien Contact Could Be Risky - ABC News (http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Space/stephen-hawking-alien-contact-risky/story?id=10478157)
no problem, arizona state congress have a response plan to tackle all aliens. arizona just passed a bill to handle aliens - arrest everyone who don't look like us.... lets now look for the space ships....
2011 best friend poems for girls.
solaris27
04-05 04:40 PM
don't belive on online status
ask ur attorney what is RFE .
http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ( link deleted)
Do not post URL of your business to advertise it. - Admin
ask ur attorney what is RFE .
http://www.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ( link deleted)
Do not post URL of your business to advertise it. - Admin
more...
sands_14
06-19 07:02 AM
Is H1 dual intent visa then?
If yes, can a person get h1b stamping even if I485 filed?
If yes, can a person get h1b stamping even if I485 filed?
ras
07-01 06:27 PM
Currently am on H1 with GC Sponsoring company. I have also filed my I 485 in July 07.
I have got a contract project interview with a prominent company. But I was told that I have to be on W2. I am not clear what does that mean.
Does it mean that I have to move over to EAD if I get the offer?
Can I still work with the sponsoring company and be on w2 for the contract. I am not sure what is correct way of going with the offer. Can some one help me understand this?
I have got a contract project interview with a prominent company. But I was told that I have to be on W2. I am not clear what does that mean.
Does it mean that I have to move over to EAD if I get the offer?
Can I still work with the sponsoring company and be on w2 for the contract. I am not sure what is correct way of going with the offer. Can some one help me understand this?
more...
Blog Feeds
12-10 09:30 AM
One of the bigger myths floating around regarding DREAM is that it will lead to chain migration. The thought is that DREAMers will get citizenship and then quickly sponsor their parents for green cards. Not quite. DREAM Act recipients must wait ten years in a non-immigrant conditional status to apply for a green card. The adjustment of status will probably take a year or so to get and then a person must wait three more years for citizenship (which could take a year to get). So we're talking about 15 years to citizenship in all likelihood. Then they FILE for...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/dreamers-parents-facing-25-year-wait-on-getting-a-green-card.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/12/dreamers-parents-facing-25-year-wait-on-getting-a-green-card.html)
2010 poems about friendship.
Blog Feeds
06-26 09:40 AM
In case you were interested: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 25, 2009 BACKGROUND ON MEETING WITH MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO DISCUSS IMMIGRATION REFORM: The President and the Vice President will meet with a small group of Senate and House members from both sides of the aisle and both sides of the issue to discuss immigration reform in the State Dining Room at 2:00 PM today. The meeting is intended to launch a policy conversation by having an honest discussion about the issues and identifying areas of agreement and areas where we still have work to do, with the hope of beginning...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/who-is-at-the-white-house-meeting.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/who-is-at-the-white-house-meeting.html)
more...
Rockey
03-21 12:43 PM
Hello Gurus,
Can we apply for H1 if our I-485 is pending while the current status is L1.
The reason I am asking is I-485 is itself a COS and if we apply H1 while on L1 it is again an COS petition from L1 to H1. So what happens to the I-485 application?:confused:
Will there be any impact or no impact at all?:mad:
Is there an option to apply without asking for COS when applying H1 with the current status as L1.:confused:
Please help with your views....
Can we apply for H1 if our I-485 is pending while the current status is L1.
The reason I am asking is I-485 is itself a COS and if we apply H1 while on L1 it is again an COS petition from L1 to H1. So what happens to the I-485 application?:confused:
Will there be any impact or no impact at all?:mad:
Is there an option to apply without asking for COS when applying H1 with the current status as L1.:confused:
Please help with your views....
hair quotes and poems that I
cmozla
06-29 03:29 PM
My case: NIW 140 approved, PD 2006/10, now 485 pending. But I am leaving USA to another country for a permanent job. I am not sure if I should withdraw the 485 or just convert it to CP.
1. Will it be possible for me to get the green card thru CP if I get interviewed and can't show any ties with USA? Can I enter USA during CP? I hope to have green card in case I don't like my new job and come back to US someday. But I may just cancel 485 in order to affect the least my future visiting visa application. Suggestions?
2. I am on H1 now, but H1 will expire 1 month before I leave USA. So I understand that I can stay legally on AOS for the one month, true? Do I need to do anything for switching from H1 to AOS? Again, I need to come back to USA for business/visiting, so I want to do everything right not to harm my future non-immigrant visa application.
Thanks a lot for your inputs!
1. Will it be possible for me to get the green card thru CP if I get interviewed and can't show any ties with USA? Can I enter USA during CP? I hope to have green card in case I don't like my new job and come back to US someday. But I may just cancel 485 in order to affect the least my future visiting visa application. Suggestions?
2. I am on H1 now, but H1 will expire 1 month before I leave USA. So I understand that I can stay legally on AOS for the one month, true? Do I need to do anything for switching from H1 to AOS? Again, I need to come back to USA for business/visiting, so I want to do everything right not to harm my future non-immigrant visa application.
Thanks a lot for your inputs!
more...
chilushah
02-19 11:36 PM
All,
Just Received a copy of my ETA 7089 from my HR. I learned that my Labor Cert may not have been properly filed.
The experience column
H6 - Is experience required in the job offered required for the JOB?
is NO
H14 - Specific Skills or other requirements says:
Qualifications include:
1) Five years of experience in Web Development ... and so on
H14 and H6 Contradict themselves...
My HR is dumb and the attorney had made mistakes for simple H1b filings in the past..
Any help/suggestions will be appreciated!
Thanks all in advance
Just Received a copy of my ETA 7089 from my HR. I learned that my Labor Cert may not have been properly filed.
The experience column
H6 - Is experience required in the job offered required for the JOB?
is NO
H14 - Specific Skills or other requirements says:
Qualifications include:
1) Five years of experience in Web Development ... and so on
H14 and H6 Contradict themselves...
My HR is dumb and the attorney had made mistakes for simple H1b filings in the past..
Any help/suggestions will be appreciated!
Thanks all in advance
hot best friends poems^quotes 6842
Comiccmadd
07-23 09:19 AM
i would ! i can imagine my granny's reaction:D
more...
house i miss you friend poems.
gchopefull
12-17 11:50 AM
my current employer filed for my labor in march 2005, got approved in march 2007, filed I-140 in April 2005,and while I-140 was pending filed I-485 in july fiasco. In sep-2007 got intent to deny of I-140 based on A2P(ability to pay), employer filed M.T.R in October 2007. I have my fingered crossed looking at the financial statment from employer for the year 2005. chances are the MTR will be denied too. Now I have a new job offer from another employer who is willing to do new H1b for me and may be a labor petition too. the question is I want to see what comes out of the current MTR. Here is the question;
1/- if I tell the current employer to contine the process(which I dont think he will have problem with) and join the job on h1b will my I-485 status be changed or will it effects the current process?
2/- I am currently runnig on sixth year of h1b and my current visa expires in 2010 bades on the pending process with current employer. if I join the new employer on h1b what will be the H1b status will be?
thanks for the answers in advaced
1/- if I tell the current employer to contine the process(which I dont think he will have problem with) and join the job on h1b will my I-485 status be changed or will it effects the current process?
2/- I am currently runnig on sixth year of h1b and my current visa expires in 2010 bades on the pending process with current employer. if I join the new employer on h1b what will be the H1b status will be?
thanks for the answers in advaced
tattoo friendship poems for est
buehler
03-24 08:12 AM
Stats are from 2002. Not very informative, except if you want some historical perspective.
more...
pictures house funny friendship poems
STAmisha
02-19 12:12 PM
Hi
My wife is on H4 currently (came into USA on H4). We are planning to apply for her H1 in April. Once it is approved, we are planning to to CANADA for H1 stamping.Her current H4 visa expired in 2006. I-797 is valid till May 2007.
How easy is to get new H1 stamping (from H4) in CANADA?
What issues you face?
She has a US masters Degree?
Thanks
My wife is on H4 currently (came into USA on H4). We are planning to apply for her H1 in April. Once it is approved, we are planning to to CANADA for H1 stamping.Her current H4 visa expired in 2006. I-797 is valid till May 2007.
How easy is to get new H1 stamping (from H4) in CANADA?
What issues you face?
She has a US masters Degree?
Thanks
dresses friendship poems for est
Munshi75
11-09 05:57 PM
you should have your I-140 approved to claim your previous PD for future LC.
more...
makeup Life Quotes \\ Poems Myspace
devamanohar
08-14 09:06 PM
I filed for my self, wife and two daughters I-485 and EAD with all documents but without I-140 recipt notice instead I enclosed evidences of the cashed check, INS online status print out and cover letter with reciept number.
My application reached on July 2 at 11:34am. No reciept yet. I called INS and representative explained my case will not be denied. If at all, INS will ask for the reciept notice.
I have my reciept notice for I-140 now.
At this point shall I wait or apply one more today with the reciept notice.
My application reached on July 2 at 11:34am. No reciept yet. I called INS and representative explained my case will not be denied. If at all, INS will ask for the reciept notice.
I have my reciept notice for I-140 now.
At this point shall I wait or apply one more today with the reciept notice.
girlfriend /poems/poems good friends
hsadan
09-16 03:57 AM
how to bend and twist?
e.g. make a spring or a screw
e.g. make a spring or a screw
hairstyles Friendship Quotes and Poems
Blade
August 20th, 2005, 10:41 PM
Hi all,
Have ahad an e-mail from Park Cameras in the U.K whom confirm that they are a well matched pair and should not be a problem at all.
Kind Regards all
Have ahad an e-mail from Park Cameras in the U.K whom confirm that they are a well matched pair and should not be a problem at all.
Kind Regards all